Blog 10:EQ

I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ.

A) No, because it isn't a question that requires much thinking or in depth research. It doesn't have enough framework.

B) Yes, because it meets all three requirements. It's not just a simple answer that the audience can google. When you think about it you consider all factors that could go wrong so you don't know the answer right away.

C) Yes, because it's clear and makes sense but also makes you wonder what the answer might be. Specifically for this question because every customer is different so you just can't answer this question in one way.

D) No, because I feel that it doesn't take a stance or that once you find the answer that you can see both sides of.

In what way can a special education advisor best help her students complete their academic goals?

Blog 9: Lesson 1 Reflection

1.) What are you most proud of in your Lesson 1 Presentation and why?

I would have to say that I am most proud of my closing statement because it was something different, I posed a question, and I gave the audience something to think about.

2.) 

     a) What assessment would you give yourself on your Lesson 1 Presentation(self-assessment)?

I would give myself an AP for my presentation.

    b.) Explain why you deserve that grade using evidence from the Lesson 1 Presentation (self-assessment)?

I would give myself that grade because I don't feel  that I met the P requirements, and I could have been better prepared for my presentation.

3.) What worked for you in your Lesson 1? 

What worked in my presentation was that I had good information and I feel like I explained everything as best I could with relatable examples.

4.) (What didn't work) If you had a time machine, what would you have done differently to improve your Lesson 1?

What didn't work in my presentation was my hook activity because the audience didn't seem to respond to it well and I would've rehearsed more if given a chance to go back.